Codex is a descriptive term, used to describe the form or appearance of the item, and to distinguish it from rolls or loose charters. The word codex first appeared in Latin to describe public records or accounts that were written on wooden tablets which were then connected (or bound) on one side. The wooden tablets were eventually replaced by paper leaves and by parchment. Classical libraries contained books that were written on scrolls. The codex became popular in the Christian era because it was easier to read and to store than a scroll.
The word book implies a modern printed work that has been published and exists in many copies. It can be bound in hardcover or in paperback. The modern book is not a unique object – for example, if you drop your paperback in the bath or spill coffee on it, you can replace it with an identical copy.
A manuscript is a handwritten book. Today we may use the word to refer to an unpublished work. Before the invention of printing, all books existed in manuscript form. Then, manuscripts were the only way to record and transmit texts. A medieval manuscript is a unique object that is considered an artifact worthy of study apart from its texts. Cataloguing manuscripts is a highly specialized field with its own vocabulary to describe their appearance. Starting at the outside and working in:
Manuscript texts are identified by the incipit, which are the first words of the text. It is easy to confuse incipits with the rubric, which describes the text. Manuscript texts are not known by author or title because such attributions are rarely exact.
The appearance and contents of each manuscript is unique. But in addition to the variations introduced by the method of manufacture, owners combined different texts together in a new codex. They may have done it for convenience, or to save space. This type of codex is called a sammelband. Each manuscript within the sammelband is treated as a different part, with its own foliation and physical description. You sometimes find such created volumes in archival collections, but there is a clear intent to file similar items together in one volume.
Usually, manuscript cataloguers make a distinction between manuscripts, which are the work of authors, and archival materials, which are the records of an institution. The same terms are used to describe medieval manuscripts and medieval archives, with some differences:
Archival texts are not identified by incipits. Most parts of the document are highly formulaic, so incipits are useless to identify unique texts. Instead, they are identified by a set of five criteria:
A summary of the document would also include the purpose of the document
The only documents that are identified by incipits are papal bulls, and even then it helps to note the five criteria. Collections of bulls are called bullaria.
These methods of identifying texts are different from shelfmarks and archival numbers. Researchers use shelfmarks and archival numbers to cite their original source material. Researchers may think of shelfmarks and archival numbers as call numbers. There are, however, significant differences. Before the invention of modern cataloguing systems, codices were labeled according to their position on the shelf. Hence the term shelfmark, which would refer to the shelf where the manuscript was located and its position on the shelf. Archival numbers are similar – archival items are listed by series, and by their location within the series. Modern call numbers are assigned by cataloguing systems, which classify the books according to their author, title, and subject. Call numbers cannot be changed without reclassifying the book. Shelf marks and archival numbers can be changed when the librarian rearranges the shelves. Therefore, manuscript cataloguers are more comfortable recording the internal aspects that cannot be changed, like the incipit and the criteria.
Central European University Medieval Manuscript Manual, http://www.ceu.hu/medstud/manual/MMM/index.html (Versions available in English, Italian, Hungarian, and Russian)
Society of American Archivists, http://www.archivists.org/
Standards for archival description handbook: http://www.archivists.org/catalog/stds99/index.html
- Archives Association of British Columbia, A MANUAL FOR SMALL ARCHIVES http://aabc.bc.ca/aabc/msa/appendix_glossary_of_terms.htm
Smithsonian Institution guidelines for record management, http://www.si.edu/archives/archives/2rmhome.html
Mount Holyoke College, Definitions of archival terms, http://www.mtholyoke.edu/lits/library/arch/ref/def.shtml
Posted 30 November 2003
An Introduction to Maltese Archives
Theresa M. Vann
The Malta Study Center
The Hill Monastic Manuscript Library
Collegeville, MN 56321
USA