You will begin your work in Kremsmünster!
Part 2: Looking for a Place to Start
|
 |
Then came August 1964still no further responses
from the Benedictine monasteries in Europeapart from the
tenuous acceptance from Monte Cassino. This made me
wonder whether the project was at all possible. Fr.
Odo Zimmermann was visiting then at Saint Johnsfrom
our foundation, Abadia Del Tepeyac, in Mexico. He
mentioned that they had needed a librarian at their
monastery and school. But when he brought the
matter to Abbot Baldwin, the abbot decided against the
idea and wanted me to go to Europe anyhow and give it a
try. So, ex obedientia, I made plans to
proceed.
I wrote to Monte Cassino that I was coming. When
I arrived on October 5, 1964, I explained to the
librarian just what it all meant; namely, that we would
work with two cameras operated by laymen and that the job
would take about five or six months. Monte
Cassino
had a good-sized manuscript collection despite depletions
suffered during the reign of commendatory abbots in the
fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. The next day he
laid down three conditions: (1) we could not bring laymen
into the monastery because of the previous bombing; (2)
we could not work there a long time; (3) he wanted a copy
of everything that we would microfilm in Europe. Any
of those three conditions would have made it impossible
for us to do our job at Monte Cassino, let alone the
three nullifying factors taken together. I also
learned later that we could not have operated at Monte
Cassino anyhow, as the Italian government would not have
allowed it. That government had ruled that all
microfilming of manuscripts and archive material must be
done by the government or under its control and that the
state provides private institutions with the proper
equipment if such work is to be done. That is
precisely what happened at the abbeys of Subiaco and
Cava, each of which had a smaller manuscript collection.
Each had a large mounted camera from the state and a
developing room, and each photographed its manuscripts
for us (Subiaco 300, Cava 60). They did this after
two years, though the quality of their filming does not
compare favorably with the work we did. The abbey
of Montevergine, which had only twenty manuscripts but
was also equipped with a mounted camera had a developing
room (it had a precious archives) also agreed to provide
us microfilm copies of its manuscripts, but never did so.
When nothing was accomplished at Monte Cassino, I
decided to try my luck in Switzerland. On the way I
stopped in Rome for a few days. There, through the
courtesy of Fr. Ulric Beste, I met Abbot Benno Gut of
Einsiedeln Archabbey, who was attending the Vatican
Council. Our project appealed to him, and he wrote
to his librarian, granting us permission to begin the
project at Einsiedeln. But even before my departure
from Rome, I received a letter from the Einsiedeln
librarian informing me that we could not photograph their
manuscripts. He added politely that I was welcome
to come for a visit, but not for microfilming. A
few days later I arrived at Einsiedeln. The
guestmaster at Einsiedeln was a fine man, something like
our Fr. Fabian Wegleitner, and liked our project. He
put me in contact by phone with the librarian, a
monsignor, at Saint Gall, a former famous Benedictine
abbey. The monastery was dissolved in 1849, but the
library remained intact and became the property of the
Catholic Church in the Canton of Saint Gall.
| The monsignor received me politely and let me see some
of their precious manuscripts, including the famous codex
914, probably the oldest existing copy of the Regula
Sancti Benedicti (it is probably a copy of the copy
which Charlemagne had made of the original copy in Monte
Cassino) but he also informed me that we could not
photograph their manuscripts. He said that they did
not need us since they had their own equipment and for
some years were photographing their own manuscripts as
needed. Later I learned that he also photographed
Einsiedeln manuscripts when requested to do so.
At Engelberg both the abbot and
the librarian said they would go along with our
project if other Swiss Benedictine libraries
would do so. There I also learned that
there was an association of religious libraries
in Switzerland (Benedictine, Dominican,
Franciscan, Jesuit) which had their annual
convention two months before my arrival. At
the meeting the association had decided to reject
our offer. In
Rome the Einsiedeln abbot had
not yet known about this decision. |

Success at
last: Father Aelred Tegels, OSB, in Switzerland in
the 1990's.
|
In Switzerland I experienced the second
setback for our project. I decided to continue my
exploratory visits in Austria with actually little hope
of success since nobody from Austria had answered Abbot
Baldwins letter. I had the feeling that by
Christmas or shortly after I would be on my return
journey to the States, empty-handed. From
Einsiedeln I wrote to the Benedictine abbeys in Austria,
mentioning just when I planned to visit each abbey to
discuss our offer. I allowed three days for travel
and a visit to each abbey, beginning the trip on November
15 and planning to be back at Einsiedeln by December 20
to rest and spend Christmas. As at the four abbeys
in Italy and the three in Switzerland, it was the same
story at all but two of the ten Austrian abbeys which I
visited. They are located in characteristic
Benedictine fashion off the beaten path, and my traveling
was all done via public transportation in the late fall
and early winter months. How often did I stand in
the rain or drizzle or even snow waiting for bus connections.
But I made itand survived.
Continue
Title Page
|